Speaking homework you can actually check
"Practise your speaking at home" is the least-completed instruction in language teaching. Not because students are lazy — because they know nothing happens if they don't.
7 min readStudents do the work that gets checked. Set speaking tasks that produce something — a recording, a transcript, a score — rather than tasks that rely on trust, and keep them short enough to finish in one sitting. Then be visibly seen to have looked at them, because that is what makes the next one get done.
Why speaking homework doesn't get done
Written homework has a built-in artefact. There is a page, the teacher will see the page, and a missing page is visible. Speaking homework traditionally has none of that. The student practises or does not, and no one can tell which happened.
Given that, not doing it is a rational choice by a busy teenager with five other subjects. The fix is not more insistence — it is giving the task an artefact.
Students are more likely to do the work if it will be checked. Speaking homework has historically been the one thing that could not be.
Tasks that produce something
All of these leave evidence, work on a phone, and take under fifteen minutes.
- 1Read the passage aloud. The text is set, so it is comparable between students and it drills the sounds you taught this week. Lowest barrier of anything here — nothing has to be invented.
- 2Have the conversation. Give a situation and a goal: order a meal, return a broken item, persuade someone to come to an event. The student talks, unscripted, and a transcript comes back.
- 3Answer three questions. Short spoken responses to questions about a text they read. Bridges reading and speaking, and it is hard to fake having read.
- 4Re-record the same task next week. Same passage, seven days later. The comparison is motivating in a way a score never is.
“Could I have a refund, please?” — exactly the right register!
Make the checking sustainable
The reason speaking homework gets abandoned by teachers rather than students is the marking. Thirty recordings at three minutes each is ninety minutes of listening, weekly. That is not a habit anyone keeps.
So separate two different jobs. Every student needs feedback. You do not need to personally generate all of it.
- Automatic first pass, for everyone. Every student gets feedback on every attempt, immediately, while they still remember what they said. Immediate matters more than authoritative here.
- Your attention, targeted. Scan who completed it and where scores clustered. Listen properly to three or four — the struggling, the surprising, the suspiciously perfect.
- One visible class-wide response. Three minutes next lesson on the thing most people got wrong. This is what proves the homework was read.
Should it be graded?
Mostly no. Speaking practice is where students should be willing to try a structure they might get wrong, and a grade attached to every attempt teaches them to play safe — which is the opposite of what improves speaking.
Track completion rather than quality for routine practice. Grade the occasional piece, tell them in advance which one, and let everything else be low-stakes.
- Students attempt harder language
- Errors surface where they can be fixed
- Completion is the measure, which is easy to check
- Students use only language they are certain of
- Recordings get re-done until safe and rehearsed
- You assess performance, not ability
Bring Dily to your classrooms
Tell us about your school and we'll set up a demo tailored to how your teachers work. Pilot programs available.